Eurobloat #0172 • August 2024
August, traditionally the quiet month, produced one of the most revealing episodes of the year: a senior commissioner brandishing the EU's content law to threaten a foreign businessman over an interview that had not yet happened, on a platform hosted outside the Union, with a United States presidential candidate.
Folly of the Month: threatening a livestream in America from a desk in Brussels
On 12 August the internal market commissioner, Thierry Breton, published a letter warning Elon Musk that his forthcoming live interview with Donald Trump could fall foul of the Digital Services Act, because whatever was said might affect "public security" in the EU. Reach far enough and that logic lets Brussels police any conversation anywhere on earth. A union that began as a common market now appoints itself referee of an American livestream, and calls it protecting Europeans.
→ heise.de
1. Even the Commission edged away
So awkward was the letter that the Commission itself declined to fully stand behind it, leaving Breton out on his limb. When your own institution will not defend your threat, the threat was a mistake.
2. Brussels, openly mocked
Musk replied with an unprintable line lifted from a Hollywood comedy, and much of the internet laughed along. Picking a censorship fight you then lose to a meme is not the conduct of a confident superpower.
3. Free-speech groups raise the alarm
A coalition of free-expression organisations called the letter an "alarming disregard for freedom of expression". When the people who defend speech for a living are alarmed, the speech police have overreached.
4. "Public order" as an all-purpose excuse
The episode showed how the DSA's elastic language lets Brussels treat almost any speech as a risk to be managed. A rule that can be stretched to cover anything is a rule that protects no one but the censor.
→ heise.de
5. Washington takes note
The United States Congress pressed the EU over what it saw as an attempt to censor political speech on X. The Union's content rules are fast becoming a transatlantic grievance rather than a model anyone wishes to copy.
6. The AI Act starts its clock
On 1 August the AI Act formally entered into force, beginning the countdown on a regime industry had begged Brussels to slow down. The continent that cannot grow a tech champion pressed start on the rules to bind one.
7. A commissioner freelancing threats in the Union's name
Breton's letter was very much his own production, fired off with the swagger of a man who mistakes his portfolio for a pulpit. Personal vanity, dressed as European law, is a poor way to govern.
8. The reflex to threaten first
What the affair exposed was the instinct beneath the rulebook: when in doubt, warn, menace and reach for the law. A confident democracy argues with speech it dislikes; Brussels reaches for a letterhead.
9. The censor's law, working as designed
For all the embarrassment, the DSA functioned exactly as critics warned it would, as a lever to lean on platforms over lawful speech. The scandal is not that Breton misused it; it is that the tool exists to be used this way at all.
→ heise.de
Enjoyed this post?
Well, you could share the post with others, follow me with RSS Feeds and/or send me a comment via email.
Tags
Category:
Year: